<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of VistA:  Community versus Congressionally Mandated Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crossoverhealth.com/2008/07/30/the-future-of-vista-community-versus-congressionally-mandated-leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crossoverhealth.com/2008/07/30/the-future-of-vista-community-versus-congressionally-mandated-leadership/</link>
	<description>The Next Generation of Health Care</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:55:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GCPR Redux - The Call For Government EHR Unification &#171; Crossover Healthcare</title>
		<link>http://blog.crossoverhealth.com/2008/07/30/the-future-of-vista-community-versus-congressionally-mandated-leadership/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>GCPR Redux - The Call For Government EHR Unification &#171; Crossover Healthcare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossoverhealth.wordpress.com/?p=201#comment-424</guid>
		<description>[...] on my VistA kick (here and here), I need to respond to several important errors of understanding in the recent press release hailed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on my VistA kick (here and here), I need to respond to several important errors of understanding in the recent press release hailed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Trotter</title>
		<link>http://blog.crossoverhealth.com/2008/07/30/the-future-of-vista-community-versus-congressionally-mandated-leadership/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Trotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossoverhealth.wordpress.com/?p=201#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Excellent points. In fact the only counter that I have to your idea, and the only reason that I did not suggest the same thing, is that Congress continually does things or allows things that really threaten the VistA lifecycle. 

But you either have to solve one of two problems. You either have to get some FOSS organization be trusted MORE than the VA itself regarding VistA. OR you have to accomplish what I am suggested, embedding a Mozilla foundation directly within the VA itself.

Frankly, either one is pretty unlikely, which is why fear for the future of VistA. The nice thing about your plan, is that if the VA falls flat on its face, is that an &quot;Apache Foundation for VistA&quot; is much more likely to arise under those circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points. In fact the only counter that I have to your idea, and the only reason that I did not suggest the same thing, is that Congress continually does things or allows things that really threaten the VistA lifecycle. </p>
<p>But you either have to solve one of two problems. You either have to get some FOSS organization be trusted MORE than the VA itself regarding VistA. OR you have to accomplish what I am suggested, embedding a Mozilla foundation directly within the VA itself.</p>
<p>Frankly, either one is pretty unlikely, which is why fear for the future of VistA. The nice thing about your plan, is that if the VA falls flat on its face, is that an &#8220;Apache Foundation for VistA&#8221; is much more likely to arise under those circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
